Sales · Head-to-Head

Loom vs. Vidyard for Sales Prospecting Videos

Two async-video tools small B2B teams keep landing on when they want to send personalized videos in cold outreach and deal follow-ups. We compared current official pricing, sales features, and CRM fit for a five-seat team in September 2026.

Tested by Marcus Feld·September 10, 2026·4 rounds
Loom
Atlassian
2rounds
78 / 100 overall
vs
Vidyard
Vidyard
2rounds
82 / 100 overall
The verdict

If the job is sales prospecting, meaning personalized cold-outreach videos, deal walkthroughs pushed into a sequencer, and engagement data landing in your CRM, Vidyard is the better fit for a small B2B team, and it has a free tier a rep can start on today. It's also materially more expensive per seat once you upgrade, and its heaviest AI features sit behind Business and Enterprise plans. Loom is the better daily driver for internal walkthroughs, customer onboarding videos, and async updates, and at $18 per Creator per month it's roughly a third of Vidyard's paid entry price. Most small B2B teams we'd advise pick Vidyard for the reps who actually prospect and keep Loom (or its free tier) for everyone else. If your reps live in HubSpot, Salesloft, or Outreach, Vidyard's native integrations decide it.

This is a documentation-based comparison, not a hands-on bake-off. We read each product's current official pricing and feature pages in September 2026 and scored four rounds against the job a small B2B sales team actually has: send personalized video in cold outreach, walk a prospect through a proposal, and get the engagement signal back into the CRM without a lot of glue work.

Both tools record your screen and webcam, host the video, and give the viewer a shareable page. The interesting differences show up in three places: what the free and entry-level plans actually include, how each one connects to a sales stack (CRM, sequencer, Zapier), and what the AI layer does for a rep who doesn't want to appear on camera every time. We priced a five-seat team on each product's cheapest paid tier and noted where a small team can get useful work done without paying at all.

Round by round

Price for a five-seat sales team
WinnerLoom

How we testedWe compared the cheapest self-serve paid plan on each product's official pricing page and multiplied by five seats. We also noted the free tier and what it includes, since a small team often starts one or two reps before rolling out.

Loom is dramatically cheaper at the entry point. Its Business plan is billed per Creator, and the pricing page lists monthly and annual options with a 17% annual discount. Loom's Business plan is listed at $18 per user per month, which puts five seats at roughly $90 a month. Vidyard's self-serve Starter is $59/user/month and Teams is $99/user/month, which puts a five-seat team at $295 to $495 a month. Vidyard wins on the free tier if you want to try before you buy, since its free plan includes 15 AI videos per month plus stock avatars, but on straight paid price for a small team, Loom is a fraction of the cost.

Sales prospecting features out of the box
WinnerVidyard

How we testedWe compared what each product ships for the specific work of sending personalized outreach video: call-to-action overlays, AI script generation, AI avatars, and workflows that generate personalized videos at scale from a list.

Vidyard is built around sales video, and the feature set reflects it. Its pricing page lists AI Avatars (stock avatars on all plans, custom avatars on Business plans or with the Video Agent add-on), an AI Sales Script Generator, and ready-to-use CTAs like full-screen prompts, banners, and email capture forms that can be placed at any point in a video. Vidyard's Summer 2026 update centers on Video Agent, which triggers automated video workflows and can generate personalized AI videos at scale from lists connected to HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, and Salesloft. Loom's paid plans include custom branding, engagement insights, and drawing/mouse-emphasis tools, and Loom's AI suite handles auto-titles, transcription, and instant editing after recording, but Loom doesn't ship a comparable AI-avatar-plus-script-generator flow for list-based prospecting.

CRM and sequencer fit
WinnerVidyard

How we testedWe read each product's official pages for named integrations with the tools a small B2B sales team is likely to use (HubSpot, Salesforce, Salesloft, Outreach, Gong, and Zapier) and checked whether video engagement data syncs back to the CRM.

Vidyard's official pages call out native integrations with HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, Salesloft, Eloqua, and Pardot for syncing video engagement data, plus deeper Video Agent workflows that run inside HubSpot, Gong Flows, and Salesloft Cadences and extend across other tools via Zapier. A rep can drop a video into an existing cadence step and the view and watch data lands on the contact record. Loom is an Atlassian product, and the sales-stack integration story on its own site is thinner: workspaces, Atlassian Guard on Enterprise, and general sharing. For a team whose pipeline already lives in HubSpot or Salesloft, Vidyard's native hooks are the honest reason to pick it.

Everyday recorder ergonomics
WinnerLoom

How we testedWe compared the everyday recording experience described on each product's site: chrome extension, editing after recording, shareable link with viewer analytics, and limits on the free tier so a new rep can actually try it.

Loom is the better generic recorder, and it's the one most colleagues already have installed. The Business plan advertises unlimited videos with unlimited recording time, basic waveform editing, and up to 50 free Creator Lite seats per workspace. That last piece matters when only two or three reps need paid recording features but the rest of the team wants to watch and comment. Vidyard's free plan caps a library at 25 videos and its heavier recording, branding, and analytics features move up-plan. For internal walkthroughs and customer onboarding recordings, meaning the work that isn't strictly prospecting, Loom's ergonomics and unit economics win.

Loom is the tool most of your colleagues already have installed for internal walkthroughs. Vidyard is the tool built specifically around sending video into a sales cadence and pulling engagement back into the CRM. Both record your screen and webcam and hand the prospect a shareable page. The differences that matter for a five-seat sales team come down to price, sales features, and integration depth.

Where Vidyard wins

Vidyard is built for revenue teams, and the current lineup reflects that. Its pricing page lists stock avatars created with paid actors, licensed for commercial use and available on all plans, an AI Sales Script Generator that can produce a script in seconds, and ready-to-use CTAs (full-screen prompts, banners, or email capture forms) that can be assigned at any point in a video with minimal setup. The 2026 push is Video Agent: automated workflows that trigger the right video at the right time and launch directly in HubSpot, Gong Flows, and Salesloft Cadences, or extend across thousands of tools via Zapier.

That connectivity is the real reason to pick Vidyard if your reps live in a CRM or sequencer. Its own materials describe the platform as one that automatically generates personalized AI videos at scale using workflows connected to HubSpot, Salesforce, Marketo, Salesloft, and Zapier, and it syncs video engagement data with Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo, Eloqua, and Pardot to track performance and personalize follow-ups. Loom doesn’t ship anything equivalent for list-based, cadence-driven video prospecting.

The other thing Vidyard has going for a small team: a real free tier. The free plan includes 15 AI videos per month, with three custom AI Avatars plus unlimited use of stock Avatars. A rep can start prospecting with it today.

Where Loom wins

Loom wins on price and on the everyday recorder. Its own pricing page confirms both a monthly and annual option, and notes that customers can be billed monthly but save 17% if they pay annually. The published tiers are Starter, Business, Business + AI, and Enterprise, with a discounted Education plan for teachers and students who qualify. Loom’s Business plan is listed on the pricing page at $18 per user per month, with Business + AI at $24 per user per month.

Either number is a fraction of Vidyard’s self-serve entry point, where plans start with a free tier of 15 AI videos per month, Starter at $59/user/month, Teams at $99/user/month, and custom Enterprise pricing. On five paid seats, that’s roughly $300 to $500 a month on Vidyard versus $90 a month on Loom Business.

The other Loom advantage a small team feels immediately is seat economics. Both yearly and monthly plans provide free Creator Lite accounts, up to 50 in a Business Workspace. Pricing is based on the number of Creators, and Creator Lite accounts are always free. That’s the right shape when two reps need paid recording and the rest of the team just needs to watch, comment, and share.

Watch the billing model

Loom’s billing is per Creator and pro-rated when you add seats. The subscription price depends on how many paid members (Creators or Admins) you upgrade, is recalculated automatically as you increase or decrease those seats, and Creator Lite members are free and don’t affect the price. That’s friendly to a team that grows a rep at a time. Vidyard also uses straightforward per-seat licensing, but its Starter tier is billed by credit card and everything above it’s invoiced. The Starter plan is billed by credit card; other tiers are invoiced, with annual and multi-year billing options. Small teams that want month-to-month flexibility should stay on Vidyard Starter or plan for an annual commitment on Teams.

Who should pick which

Pick Vidyard if the job is sales prospecting and your team already uses HubSpot, Salesforce, Salesloft, or Outreach. The native sync, the CTA overlays, the AI script generator, and Video Agent are all pointed at the work of getting replies and booking meetings from cold and mid-funnel outreach. Start reps on the free tier, and only upgrade the seats that’ll actually send video into cadences. Pair it with the sequencer that runs your outbound. If you haven’t settled on one, our best AI cold email outreach platforms guide and best AI sales prospecting platforms for small B2B teams guide are the two ranked lists most teams pair Vidyard with.

Pick Loom if the primary job is internal walkthroughs, async updates, customer onboarding videos, and the occasional prospecting video from a founder or a single AE. At roughly a third of Vidyard’s per-seat price, and with 50 free Creator Lite seats per workspace, Loom is the more defensible line item for a small team that isn’t running video-heavy outbound. If you’re pairing async video with a LinkedIn play (inMails, comments, connection follow-ups), our best AI LinkedIn outreach tools for small B2B teams guide is the companion.

A workable answer for many teams is to run both: Vidyard on the reps who prospect, Loom (or Loom Starter) for everyone else. The tools do overlapping work but they’re optimized for different jobs, and the price difference is large enough that forcing everyone onto Vidyard for the sake of one tool is usually the wrong call.

What we didn’t test

This is a documentation-based comparison. We didn’t record dozens of videos on each product, benchmark upload speed on a slow connection, or measure reply rates in a live cadence. Both companies publish reply-rate case studies on their own sites; treat those as vendor claims, not independent tests. If you want real numbers, run a two-week pilot with two reps on each product against the same 100-prospect list and compare open, watch, and reply rates. That’s the only test that answers the question for your team.

Sources